⚡ Operational Intelligence for Program & Release Leaders

Diagnose delivery risk
before it becomes
executive escalation.

13 questions across 7 maturity dimensions. Instant score. Identify dependency risk, execution bottlenecks, decision quality gaps, and program visibility failures in under 4 minutes.

13Questions
7Dimensions
4 minCompletion
FreeAlways
Start Assessment ↓

No account required · Results appear instantly

Risk Visibility Dependency Ownership Decision Quality Execution Clarity Program Visibility Customer Impact Learning Velocity
How it works

Built for release and program leaders who need signal, not ceremony.

Most program health checks are lagging indicators. This assessment surfaces the operational gaps that cause releases to slip and escalations to happen before they appear on a dashboard.

01

Answer 13 questions

Each question is drawn from real delivery failure patterns across healthcare, fintech, and enterprise SaaS environments.

02

Get your score instantly

Your overall maturity score and dimension-level breakdown appear immediately. No email required, no waiting.

03

See your risk flags

The dimensions where your program is most exposed are highlighted so you know exactly where to focus first.

04

Act on the gaps

Each dimension maps to concrete operating model improvements you can implement without adding bureaucratic overhead.

13 Question Operational Maturity Assessment

Answer each question based on your current program state. Your score and dimension breakdown appear instantly after completing all 13.

0 of 13 answered
Dimension 1 · Risk Visibility
Question 01
Are program risks visible before they impact committed milestones?
Yes, consistently
Sometimes
Rarely
Question 02
Are delivery risks framed in terms of business impact and used to drive prioritization decisions?
Yes, risks directly inform prioritization
Sometimes translated, rarely drives decisions
Risks stay technical, disconnected from business impact
Dimension 2 · Dependency Ownership
Question 03
Are dependency owners clearly defined across teams?
Yes, clearly defined
Partially defined
Ownership is unclear
Question 04
Are risks, issues, and dependencies reviewed with the right people at the right frequency to drive decisions?
Yes, right people, right frequency, clear outcomes
Reviews happen but attendance or outcomes are inconsistent
Reviews are infrequent or ineffective
Dimension 3 · Decision Quality
Question 05
Do leadership reviews consistently produce clear decisions and action items?
Yes, decisions and owners are always clear
Sometimes, depends on the meeting
Reviews are mostly status updates
Question 06
Are technical trade-offs discussed with clear data, defined constraints, and the right decision-makers present?
Yes, trade-offs are structured and data-informed
Sometimes, often missing data or the right people
Trade-offs are ad hoc or avoided
Dimension 4 · Execution Clarity
Question 07
Do teams have clear ownership for action items and decisions?
Yes, always clear
Sometimes clear
Often unclear
Question 08
Is there a repeatable escalation path for blocked execution?
Yes, clearly documented
Informal path exists
No clear path
Dimension 5 · Program Visibility
Question 09
Can leadership quickly see the true health of the program?
Yes, highly visible
Partially visible
Visibility is weak
Question 10
Is there a clear, lightweight operating rhythm that keeps teams aligned without adding unnecessary overhead?
Yes, mature and lightweight
Basic rhythm exists
No consistent rhythm
Dimension 6 · Customer and User Impact
Question 11
Are launch readiness criteria clearly defined and understood across teams before key milestones?
Yes, consistently
Sometimes
Rarely
Question 12
Does the team understand how program delays or quality gaps affect end-user experience?
Yes, user impact is always part of the conversation
Sometimes discussed, often an afterthought
Rarely connected to user experience
Dimension 7 · Learning Velocity
Question 13
Does the team conduct structured retrospectives that lead to measurable improvements in delivery?
Yes, retros consistently drive improvements
Retros happen but follow-through is inconsistent
Retros are rare or ineffective

Answer all 13 questions to see your results

Your program health score

Built by a Senior TPM who needed it on a Monday morning.

I spent years pulling raw Jira data every Monday and hand-writing executive narratives. Program Health Pulse is the tool I built so I would never have to do that again.

I am Sruthi Khanna, a Senior Technical Program Manager and Release Manager with 15 years delivering complex cross-functional programs across regulated healthcare, enterprise SaaS, and AI-enabled technology environments.

30+
Zero-incident production releases
100%
On-time OKR milestone performance
60%
Overhead reduction through Claude and Copilot
15yr
Regulated healthcare and enterprise delivery